Syed Mohidoddin, v. The State Of Telangana,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE P.KESHAVA RAO WRI T PETI TI ON NO. 35086 OF 2014 ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned GP appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. 2.

The prayer sought in the Writ Petition is as under: "....to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 3 & 4 herein in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 5th respondent and directing the petitioner to settle out the issues with the 5th respondent and threatening the petitioner to implicate him in criminal cases as being illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India apart from without any authority of law and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner without there being any crime is registered."

3.

The basic grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.5 and directing the petitioner to settle the issues with respondent No.5 or else threatening the petitioner that he would be implicated in criminal cases.

4.

Learned GP appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 placed on record, the written instructions issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, CCS, DD, Hyderabad, stating that the police did not interfere in the liberty of the petitioner and did not register any crime regarding the complaint of respondent No.5 as stated by the petitioner. In fact, the police received the complaint of respondent No.5 only on 14.11.2014 leading to registration of Crime No.293 of 2014 for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 406, 471, 506 and 120-B IPC. In order to verify the details pertaining to the petitioner, respondent No.2 took steps as part of the investigation. Except that, the allegations made by the petitioner are not correct. 5.

Therefore, in the light of the above said statement, this Court is of the opinion that no further orders are required in the Writ Petition.

6.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed. No order as to costs.

_______________ P. KESHAVA RAO,J Date: 8.11.2018 KPM