Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, v. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * * * * WRIT PETITION Nos.31122, 31136 and 31172 of 2015 BETWEEN Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation.

... PETITIONER AND Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office, Barkatpura, Hyderabad and others. ...RESPONDENTS DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 30.10.2015 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR 1.

Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments?

No 2.

Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

No 3.

Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment?

No

COMMON ORDER:

The writ petitions are directed against the show cause notice issued under Section 14B of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act.

2. Since the impugned order is only a show cause notice and since the jurisdiction of the authority in issuing the show cause notice is not in controversy, there is no reason to entertain the writ petitions. However, petitioner is at liberty to file objections to the show cause notice by raising all available grounds.

The writ petitions are disposed of with the liberty aforesaid. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J October 30, 2015 DSK