Dr.Sridhar Paturu v. The State Of Telangana
HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2019 in/and Criminal Petition No.4558 of 2019 and I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2019 in/and Criminal Petition No.4300 of 2019 COMMON ORDER:
The petitioner in Crl.P.No.4558 of 2019 is A.2 and the petitioner in Crl.P.No.4300 of 2019 is A.1 in same Cr.No.123 of 2019 on the file of the Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 468, 471 and 506 read with 34 IPC basing on the complaint of the 2nd respondent-defacto-complainant-the authorized representative by name Timmagi Prasanna Raghavan. 2.
Respective petitioners and self-same defacto-complainant along with their respective counsel present and the parties were identified by their respective counsel. When examined they stated that they intend to compromise the matter, pending criminal petitions, and filed petitions seeking to permit them to compromise the matter and compound the offences alleged against the respective petitioners.
3. Perused the miscellaneous petitions vide I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2019 in both the Criminal Petitions for permission to compromise the matter and consequently to quash the proceedings in the above cases against the respective petitioners. Along with the miscellaneous petitions, two separate joint memos signed by respective petitioners and the defactocomplainant, duly signed by respective counsel are filed wherein they
stated that they have amicably settled the disputes between them out of Court to the full and final satisfaction of both the parties and they have agreed to withdraw or compromise all the civil disputes pending with regard to the property involved in the above crime and the defactocomplainant has no objection to quash the proceedings in the above cases against the respective petitioners. The joint memos are also supported by separate affidavits of the defacto-complainant with similar terms 4.
Thus in view of the compromise between the parties settling the disputes amicably, they are permitted to compromise the matter and compound the offences alleged. The compromise is recorded. 5.
Accordingly, respective petitions vide I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2019 in Crl.P.No.4558 of 2019 and Crl.P.No.4300 of 2019 are allowed and consequently both the Criminal Petitions are also allowed quashing the proceedings in Cr.No.123 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 468, 471 and 506 read with 34 IPC against the respective petitioners. The respective petitioners/A.1 and A.2 are acquitted and their bail bonds, if any, shall stand cancelled. 6.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in both the Criminal Petitions, shall stand closed.
________________ JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI 30.08.2019 vvr
HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2019 in/and Criminal Petition No.4558 of 2019 and I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2019 in/and Criminal Petition No.4300 of 2019 Dt.30.08.2019 vvr