D.Narasimha Reddy v. The State Of Telangana

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA MAIN CASE No: W.A.No.518 of 2026 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl.

No.

Date

ORDER

OFFICE NOTE 4.

25.06.2026 HCJ (AKrS,J) & GMM,J Transferred to i/o folder, I.A.No.1 of 2026 before corrections, if Mr. K. Narsimha Reddy, learned counsel represents any.

Mr. I.V. Radhakrishna Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioners/appellants.

Ms. K.V. Vani, learned counsel represents Mr. V. Raja Shekar Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.10.

On hearing learned counsel for the petitioners/appellants and on being satisfied with the averments made in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of this application, the application to permit petitioner Nos.1 and 2 to pursue the instant appeal by discharging petitioner No.3 as their General Power of Attorney Holder is allowed.

I.A.No.4 of 2026 This interlocutory application seeking to dispense with filing of the certified copy of the impugned order is allowed.

I.A.No.3 of 2026 Mr. K. Narsimha Reddy, learned counsel represents Mr. I.V. Radhakrishna Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioners/appellants.

Ms. K.V. Vani, learned counsel represents Mr. V. Raja Shekar Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.10.

On hearing learned counsel for the petitioners/appellants and on being satisfied to the explanation urged, delay of 163 days in filing the instant appeal is condoned.

I.A.No.3 of 2026 is disposed of.

I.A.No.2 of 2026 Mr. K. Narsimha Reddy, learned counsel represents Mr. I.V. Radhakrishna Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioners/appellants.

Ms. K.V. Vani, learned counsel represents Mr. V. Raja Shekar Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.10.

In view of disposal of the main writ appeal, no further orders are required to be passed on this application seeking impleadment.

_______________ HCJ (AKrS,J) _______________ GMM,J W.A.No.518 of 2026 Writ appeal is disposed of.

(vide separate judgment) (B/o.) ES