High Court for State of TelanganaWP/26445/2017dismissed no costs

Asifa Tasneem, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

2017-08-173 pages

* I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND + WRI T PETI TI ON No.26445 of 2017 % Date: 17-08-2017 # Betw een:

Asifa Tasneem, D/o. N. Ayyub Hussain, R/o. H.No.8-100, Vanipenta, Mydukur Mandal, Kadapa District.

... Petitioner And

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

2. Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Registrar.

3. The Convener, NEET, Central Board of Secondary Education, Siksha Kendra, 2-Community Centre, Preet Vihar, New Delhi - 110 092.

4. The Deputy Director General, NCC (AP & T), NCC Directorate, Secunderabd.

5. The Medical Council of India, Pocket-14, Sector-8, Dwaraka Phase-1, New Delhi-110 077.

... Respondents ! Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. S.A.K. Mynoddin ^ Counsel for Respondent No.1 : G.P. for Medical & Health ^ Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 : Mr. Taddi Nageswara Rao ^ Counsel for Respondent No.3 : Ms. A. Chaya Devi ^ Counsel for Respondent No.4 : Mr. B. Narayana Reddy ^ Counsel for Respondent No.6 : Mr. Vivek Chandra Sekhar, S.

< GI ST:

> HEAD NOTE:

? Cases referred

VRS,J & TR,J W.P.No.24955/2017 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN And WRI T PETI TI ON No.26445 of 2017 ORDER: (Per VRS,J) The petitioner has come up with the above writ petition seeking a diclaration that G.O.Ms.No.123, dated 24.07.2017 clarifying as to what the expression "qualifying examination" would mean would apply only from the academic year 2018-19 onwards.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

3. The very same issue has been decided by this Court in W.P.No.23472 of 2017 and batch, dated 02.08.2017. We have held that there was no question of the Government Order taking away any vested right. Therefore, following the said judgment, this writ petition is also dismissed.

4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending in this writ petition, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN, J.

____________ T. RAJANI , J.

Js.

17th August, 2017.

VRS,J & TR,J W.P.No.24955/2017 HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND W.P.No.24955 of 2017 (Per VRS,J) 17th August, 2017 Js.