Sri Saibaba Samajam v. The Government Of Andhra Pradesh, Represented By Its

t I i [ 3302 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) I TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 18530 OF 2010 Between:

Sri Saibaba Samajam, represented by its Secretary M.Utham Kumar S/o. Ramakrishna Register No.122172, Minister Road, Nallagutta, Secunderabad - 5oo oo3 ...PETrroNER AND

1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its, Collector, Collectorate of Hyderabad, Hyderabad.

2. The Tahsildar, Secunderabad lt4andal, Secunderabad. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing proceedings L.R.No.8/2608110 dt.0517110, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and in violation of rights guaranteed under Articles 25, 26 and 300A of the Constitution of lndia consequently to set a side the proceedings in L.R.No.B/2608/2010 dated 05.07.2010 directing the respondent not to interfere with the peaceful possession of the property of the petitioner society and not to interfere with the religious affairs of the petitioner society. LA. NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP.

NO: 23403 OF 2010) Petition under Section '1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings consequent to the proceedings in L.R.No.8/260B/2010 dated 05.07.2010 restraining the 2nd respondent from interfering in any manner with the peaceful possession of the property and affairs of the petitioner society. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.18530 OF 2O1O ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive. ln view of the same, the writ petition has become infructuous.

2. Recording the aforementioned submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

3. As sequel to it, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any $ I pending, shall stand closed.

A:J T SD/.N. SRIHARI NT REGISTRAR \ /iTRUE COPY'

I S CTION OFFICER To

1. One CC to SRI A.CHANDRA SHAKER, Advocate IOPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies PSK.

GJP (o-

HIGH COURT DATED:2211012024 it ,L S T4 i

ORDER

,.a t ? I l;t; 2,25 WP.No.18530 of 2010 r DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOS WITHOUT COSTS.

(+ Tofrrt'

6c-d-q)