L. Srilatha v. Navva Narsimha Rao

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, against the Order made in 1.A.No.960 ot 2079 in O.S.No.56 ot 2077 on the file of the Court of the V Additional District Judge, Nalgonda, at Bhongir. Between:

1. L. Srilatha, wife of Manmohan Rao, aged about 40 years, OccupationHousewife, Resident of H. No.13-1-683/1/B, Poosala Basthi, Mangalhat, Hyderabad.

2. Akula Sai Chand, son of l\,4ukunda Rao, aged about 29 years, occupationBusiness, resident of H.No,3-4-105/E, L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad.

3. Akula Saketh, son of Mukunda Rao, aged about 29 years, occupation- Business, resident of H.No.3-4-105/E, L,B.Nagar, Hyderabad.

4. N. Uma Devi, wife of N. Sudarshan, aged about 34 years, occupation- Business, resident of H.No.13-1-712, Poosala Basthi, Resident of Mangalhat, Hyderabad.

5. M. Krishna, son of M. Venkatesham, aged about 32 years, occupation- Business, resident of H.No.13-1-712, Poosala Basthi, Resident of Mangalhat, Hyderabad.

...Petitioners/Plai ntiff s

AND l-. Nawa Narsimha Rao, Son of Jagannada Rao, aged about 76 years, OccupationRetired Government Employee, Resident of H. No.5-58/6/7/D, Prashanthi Nagar, '-. Old Alwal, Ssecunderabad.

2. Nawa Raghavendar Rao, Son of Jagannada Rao, aged about 59 years, Occupation- Business, Resident of H. No.9-3- 458, Rezimental Bazar, Ssecunderabad

3. Nawa Damaneshwar Rao, Son of Jagannada Rao, aged about 5L years, Occupation- Employee, Resident of H.No.5-6- 363, Opp- Sangamitra Bank, Bottuguda, Nalgonda Town and District.

..Respondents/ Defendants lA NO: 1OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to direct the learned V Additional District Judge, Nalgonda at Bhongir to dispose of l.A.No. 960 of 2019 in O.S.No. 56 oI 2017 as expeditioLrsly as possible, within a reasonable time to be fixed by this Court, pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition, in the interest of justice.

Counsel lor the Petitioners: SRI T. PRASANNA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: NONE APPEARED counsel for the Respondent No.3: sRl E. MADHAN MOHAN RAO

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER CIVIL REVISION PET ON No.1085 OF 2O2O ORDER:

This revision, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioners/plaintiFfs, requesting to direct the V Additional District Judge, Nalgonda at Bhongir, to dispose of I.A.No.960 of 2019 in O.S.No.56 of 2077 pending on its file, expeditiously

2. Heard learned counsel for the revision petitioners/plaintiffs, learned counsel for the respondents/defendants and perused the record.

3. In the course of submissions, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioners/plaintiffs filed I.A.No.960 of 2019 in O.S.No.56 of 2017 under Section 151 of CPC, seeking police protection, before the Court below. Though the said application was filed in the year 2019, it is not yet disposed of by the Court below.

4.

As per the material placed on record, the said I.A. was filed in the year 2019. Much time has been elapsed. By this time, the Court below ought to have disposed of the said Interlocutory Appl ication.

5.

Under these circumstances, the Court below is directed to dispose of I.A.No.960 of 2079 in O.S.No.56 of 2077 pending on its file within fifteen(15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

'l 6.

With the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs' The Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

SD/. K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT RE AR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The V Additional District Judge, Nalgonda, at Bhongir.

2. One CC to Sri. T. Prasanna Kumar, Advocate IOPUC]

3. One CC to Sri E. Madan Mohan Rao, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies MMK w---

HIGH COURT DRSAJ DATED:11llLlz0z0 . i.* SIe 14 iJ+ Joo 2/NoY2m * ,r

ORDER

CRP.No.L085 of 2O2O DISPOSING OF THE CIV]L REVISION PETITION WITHOUT COSTS r:'J . , 5coPrel l\- -r\tf"*