Smt.Katragadda Hemalatha, v. The Mandal Revenue Office,
I [ 3336 ] HIGH COURT-FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION NO: 29153 OF 2012 Between:
Smt.Katragadda Hemalatha, Wo Venkata Pardha Saradhi, aged about 68 years, C/o K.V.Rao, HlG 317, BHEL Township, Ramachandrapuram, Medak District. .....PETITIONER AND
1. The Mandal Revenue Office, Saroornagar Mandal, Rep. by its Deputy Collector, Nehrunagar Colony, Saroornagar Village and Mandal, RR District
2. The Special Court under A.P.Land Grabbing (Prohibition), Act, BRKR Buildings, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Regiskar.
.....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari Mandamus calling for the records from the Hon'ble Spl. Court underAP.LG(P) Act orders passed in LGC.SR.No.1777t2O11dated 2012-2011, quash the same and consequently direct the Spl. Court to conduct full pledged trial and to decide the issue, to meet the ends of justice. I.A.NO:1 OF 2012 (WPMP.NO:3719 6 0F 2012) Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
,// direct the respondents not to change or allot the schedule property to anybody, being house site plot bearing No.17 as per approved layout of Saroornagar Gram Panchayat situated in Sy.No.24 of Nehrunagar Colony, Saroornagar Village & Mandal, Rangareddy District, pending disposal of main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI T.N.M.RANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER
/ THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA UrRIT PETITION NO.291S3 of 2Ot2 ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble Si Justtce Abhirutnd. Kumar Stavili) None appeared for the petitioner, though the Writ petition is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal,. Hence, this Court has no other option, except to dismiss the case for non-prosecution. 2.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non_ prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Writ petition, sha,ll stand closed.
a\ \ SD/. N.SRIHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To
1. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
2. One CC to SRI T.N.M.RANGA RAO, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CD Copies \ SA PSKy* \
HIGH COURT DATED:2611212024 E ST4 j 1Y\ t rr) '(\,/ /.
( ) n r 1/ FEB a ( .} I
ORDER
E.io7,1-1 WP.No.29153 of 2012 DISMISSING THE W.P FOR NON _ PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.
Ia ql*{ I