Khaleel Unissa Begum v. The State Of Telengana

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF I\"IARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO: 15469 OF 2019 Between:

gu H.

m. W/o Mohammed Abdul Gafoor, Aged 77 years' Occ' N;.io,-i-i41 ib)ao, - r-v ro*"r, Asmansadh, Malakpet'

Khaleel Unissa Be Household, R/o Hyderabad.

...PETITIONER AND The State Of Telengana, Rep. By lts Principal Secretary' Municipal Al;ir';i;ri;. i"t L toli oJ"J'jp'"ni o"purtment',s6cretariat' Hvderabad ffi &;;l;Hyd"iuojo rvrriit"ip-i'c"iriorifi"n. Rep by its commis5ioner, Lower 1.

2_ Tank Bund, HYderabad.

i;;'b;;riy C'ommisioner, GHMC, Circle No 6 Sadar ltlahal' Ir/alakpet' 3.

Hvderabad.

iiti,"r,ii;lo Abdul Gaffar. S/o Late tr/lohd Ab-dul B. asith Aoed 48 vears' occ' Service in KSA, Presentlv rii" itt,ir,'"( s.n sijoi nrania'"Rep Pv his-brother l.o'c.p'.e'H"rier, r,rrr. Ar:,mli AnoJr'nLi, sl9 lglq]vl^olto Abdul' Ased 54 vears' il. c;;;;;;ent'rmptovee-,"ilo H.No i o-z-z 42tF 121' Asmangadh' Malakpet' Hyderabad.

...RES,.NDENT'

4.

Petition under Article 226 oI the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiIedtherewith,theHighCourtmaybepleasedto issueaWrit,orderordirectionmoreparticularlyoninthenatureoflvlandamus, directingRespondentsNo.2and3toinitiateactiontostopunauthorized constructionsatH.No.l6-2-T4llDl3T,situatedatAsmangarh,T'VTower'Malakpet', Hyderabad, as per Provisions of The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt S' RAJ KUMAR Counsel for Respondent No. 1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for Respondent Nos' 2 & 3: SRI PASHAM KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for Respondent No.4: SRI G' BHASKAR RAO The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICI' LALITIIA KANNEGAN'TI WRIT PETI I()N o.l ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.

2.

Permission is accorded.

3.

Accordingly, the Writ petition is disrnissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications, pending ifany, shall stand closed. SD/.L.SHIVA PARVATHI ASSISTANT REGIS R //TRUE COPY'

SECTIO FFICER To,

1. One CC to Sri S Raj Kumar Advocate IOPUC]

2. i11la CCsto Gp Foi Municipal AdminiStration & Urban Development, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

3. One CC to Sri Pasham Krishna Reddy, Advocate (OPUC)

4. One CC to Sri G. Bhaskar Rao, Advocate (OPUC)

5. Two CD Copies

6. One Spare Copy IVBC IVMA ti{r

HIGH COURT DATED: 2310312022 'f T !i { .-\- lr f, 2u (t ( OB [?R v'

* * \ l) .:_i.t

ORDER

WP.No.15469 of 2019 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN'

WITHOUT COSTS %