← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/4324/2019dismissed

S.Varma , Varma Salvaraj v. The State Of Telangana

2019-07-31G Sri Devi2 pages

THE HONOURABLE JUSTI CE G. SRI DEVI CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No. 4 3 2 4 of 2 0 1 9 ORDER :

This Criminal Petition, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed by the petitioner/ A.1, for grant of anticipatory bail in Crime No.286 of 2019 of Sanathnagar Police Station, Cyberabad, registered for the offences punishable under Section 498-A of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/ A.1, learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent/ State and perused the record.

3.

The case of prosecution, in brief, is that the marriage of the de facto complainant with A.1 was performed on 02.11.2017. At the time of marriage, the parents of the de facto complainant have given gold worth of Rs.3,00,000/ - and other household articles towards dowry. After their marriage, they lived happily for sometime. Thereafter, A.1 started harassing the de facto complainant physically and mentally for additional dowry at the instance of other accused. Hence, the aforesaid case was registered against the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner/ A.1 would submit that the allegations levelled against the petitioner are absolutely false. The petitioner is innocent and is falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions imposed by the Court and ultimately prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-State opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

6.

Having regard to the nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner/ A.1, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/ A.1.

7.

In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. However, if the petitioner/ A.1 surrenders before the Court below concerned and move an application for regular bail, after giving prior notice to the Public Prosecutor concerned, the same may be considered in accordance with law.

___________________ JUSTI CE G. SRI DEVI 31.07.2019 ssp