Tadela Sheshagiri Rao, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * * * WRIT PETITION No. 25108 of 2015 BETWEEN T.Seshagiri Rao ... PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department and others ...RESPONDENTS Date of Order pronounced: 17.08.2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers Yes/No may be allowed to see the Judgments?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

3. Whether his Lordship wish to see the Yes/No fair copy of the Judgment?

ORDER:-

Heard.

2. Writ petition is thoroughly misconceived as a Mandamus cannot be issued to direct the respondents to acquire any land. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is only interested in the capacity as a Villager. The beneficial acquisition sought to be made under earlier notification dated 27.05.2008 was questioned on the ground that he would also have been one of the beneficiaries of the house site of the acquired land. However, the said notification was admittedly quashed by this court in W.P.No.15741 of 2008 and batch dated 10.07.2014 giving liberty to the respondents to acquire the land if they choose to do so. Petitioner states that no further action is taken by the respondents and therefore seeks the Mandamus.

3. I am unable to see any legal ground or legal right of the petitioner having been infringed.

Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J August 17, 2015 LMV THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR

WRIT PETITION No. 20611 of 2015 July 31, 2015 LMV