Kasndula Srilakshmi W/O. Ramu v. State Of Telangana

[ 3183 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD '

(Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TtVO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONqPRABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 14071 OF 2O15 Between:

Kasndula Srilakshmi Wo. Ramu, Age 32 years, RJo. Karampudl Village and Mandal Guntur District -..PETITIONER AND

1. State of Telangana, Rep by its principle Secretary (Home) Secretariat, Hyderabad 2.. The Station House Officer S.R.'Nagar, Hyderabad, -

3. Pralwala Home, Rep by its Co-ordinator Fyo. 20-4-34, ll Floor, Behind Charminar Bustand, Hyderabaid :II ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order o or orders declaring the action of the 2 and 3 Respondent in trying to protect the petitioner to see her sister i.e., Swathi or Jyothi who is under the custody of 3rd Respondent house which is illegal tarbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent to consider-the representation dated 08-04l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(WPMP.

NO: 18432OF 20151 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 3 to grant permission to see the petitioner sister i.e., Swathi @ Jyothi pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. BS KARTIK & PRASAD ESR (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1&2: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14071 of 2015 ORDER:

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 20'02'2025, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, it was directed to be listed under the caption'For Dismissal' Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, neither the petitioner appears nor there is any representation on his behalf' It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter' In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/. A. SRINIVASA REDDY //TRUE COPY// tISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, loPUCl Telangana at 't. One CC to SRl. B

2. Tvio CCs to GP F Hyderabad [OUT]

3. Two CD CoPies BM GJP S KARTIK & PRASAD ESR ate OR HOME ,High Court for the State of ri

HIGH COURT DATED:25 t07t2025 1 r'lE l: -r.1'

e a),.

€ ( f M o .) ( ), ia C) 2B JUN t

ORDER

* 9|:r,.,'-.,,ro WP.No.14071 of 2015 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS