Akula Yedukondalu, v. State Of Andhra Pradesh,

Date : 10.10.2017 Between :

Akula Yedukondalu S/o late Lakshamaiah R/o 3-63 6th ward, Akulaveedhi Pamarru village and mandal Prakasam district and another Petitioner And State of A P Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur and others Respondents The Court made the following:

ORAL ORDER:

This writ petition is filed praying to declare the action of 4th respondentTahsildar in not taking steps in issuing E-pattadar Passbooks and title deeds as well as mutation of the names of the petitioners in the revenue records concerning land to an extent of Ac.2.18 cents in Survey No. 365/1 and Ac.0.25 cents in Survey No. 322/5, Pamur revenue village and mandal, Prakasam district. Petitioners placed reliance on decision of the Revenue Divisional Officer dated 10.9.2014 in support of their prayer to direct the Tahsildar to issue E-Pattadar Passbook and title deeds. Alleging inaction this writ petition is filed. 2.

Learned Government Pleader produced written instructions furnished to him, which would disclose that aggrieved by the order of Revenue Divisional Officer dated 10.9.2014 Smt. Akula Kondamma and Smt Akula Ravamma/respondents 5 and 6 filed revision before the Joint Collector and Joint Collector has issued notices to petitioners also and revision petition is pending. 3.

Since revision petition is preferred against the decision of the Revenue Divisional Officer, which is sought to be enforced and notices were already issued, Court is not inclined to grant the relief as prayed for, at this stage. Suffice to dispose of the writ petition directing the Joint Collector to dispose of the revision pending before him expeditiously after affording due opportunity to both parties.

4.

Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of directing the Joint Collector to consider and dispose of the revision petition pending before him against the decision of Revenue Divisional Officer in D.DIS/3854/13 dated 10.9.2014 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 8 weeks, after affording due opportunity to both the parties. Having regard to disposal of the writ petition without expressing any opinion on merits of the matter and direction issued is only to dispose of the pending revision preferred by them, this

Court deems that there is no need to put the respondents 5 and 6 on notice. No costs. Having regard to the same, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, are closed.

______________ P NAVEEN RAO,J DATE: 10.10.2017 TVK

Date : 10.10.2017