← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/16138/2019allowed no costs

Garrepalli Venkateshwarlu v. The State Of Telangana

2019-07-31P Naveen Rao4 pages

WRIT PETITION No.16138 OF 2019 Between:

Garrepalli Venkateshwarlu S/o Garrepalli Narayana, Aged 61 years, Occ:Defeated Ward No.8, of Jammikunta Nagarapanchat, R/o H.No.2-1-30/1, Housing Board Colony, Jammikunta Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District.

.. Petitioner And The State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents The Court made the following:

WRIT PETITION No.16138 OF 2019 ORDER:

Petitioner contested as Councilor to Ward No.8 of Jammikunta Nagar Panchayat, Karimnagar District in the elections held in the year 2014. Alleging that petitioner did not file election expenditure, order was passed on 10.05.2017 by the State Election Commission declaring the petitioner as ineligible for three years from the date of issue of that order to contest any election to be held for any office under the provisions of Telangana Municipalities Act, 1965.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State Election Commission. Learned counsel appearing for State Election Commission agrees that subject matter of the writ petition is covered by the decision of learned single judge of this Court rendered in W.P.No.2630 of 2018 and batch on 20.03.2019.

3.

From the reading of the order impugned, it is apparent that no prior notice was issued before passing such order and notice was not issued within reasonable time from the date of conclusion of election process.

4.

In W.P.No.2630 of 2018 and batch, dated 20.03.2019, learned single Judge of this Court considered the issue in detail and held such action of the State Election Commission in disqualifying the candidates on the ground that they did not file election expenditure in the elections held in the year 2014 after

long lapse of time as illegal, and amounts to arbitrary exercise of power, and set aside the similar orders passed against the petitioners therein.

5.

Following the earlier orders of this Court, this Writ Petition is also allowed by setting aside the order impugned. Pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed.

_____________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J YVL

WRIT PETITION No.16138 OFF 2019 YVL