Smt. G. Rajani , T. Rajani v. The Deputy Registrar-Cum-Officer On Special Duty,

HICH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT IUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI FIRST APPEAL NO: 215 OF 2005 Appeal under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, aggrieved by the order dated 23-11-2004 made in O.S. SR.No.7682 of 2004 by the principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at LB Nagar. Between:

Smt. G.

Housew Rajani @ T. Rajani, aged 38 years, Wfo. G. Subba Rao Occ: ife, H.No.1-2-234 / 36, Domalguda, Hyderabad. ... APPELL ANT/PLAINTIFF AND The Deputy Regis Cooperative Urba trar-cum-Officer on Special Duty,, Sri Lakshmi Mahila n Bank Limited Nacharam.

2. Sri Lakshmi Mahila Cooperative Urban Bank Limited, H.No.7-41/5, Bapujinagar Branch,, Vasundhara Cooperative Urban Bank, Habsiguda X Roads, Hyderabad rep., by Person Inchage.

3. Sri G. Subba Rao, S/ o. G. Krishna Murthy, Business R/ o. B-2, Flat No.111, Raheja Classic, Andheri Lokhandwala, Mumbai. 1.

(R1 and R3 dismissed for default vide Court Order dated 06-11-2014) ...RESPONDENTS /DEFENDANTS Counsel for the Appellanh SRI. K SOMESWARA KUMAR (Not present) Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI CH IANARDHAN REDDY The Court made the following: fUDGMENT

THE TIC N"BLE sMT. JUSTICE M.G.PRIYAf,II\IiISI]TI APPEAL SUIT No. 216 of 2OOS

JUDGMENT

Learnercl ,,'o tl se,l for thc apltcllant submittecL t tr t thc parties have not cvir r:r:rl i n r, inlerest to procced with the .rppca I Considtn Ig tl-re said submission macle by th,-. l,.6,.,.r.O counsel for the appr:llrrrr . ther App6al Suit stands rlisniss:cl lor non_ prosecution. \o or l. r as to costs.

Miscell;rnr'or s aprplications, if any, pending shall stand dismissed sd/- I. r{,\GA LAKSHMT DE1' J TY REGISTRAR /ITRUECOPY// II w ST ('TIoN OFFICER To, The Principa L istrict Judge, Rangareddy Distri< t at [-.li Ne gar One CC k, Sri. l( Someslvara Kurnar Aclvocate lOt'tI( '

One CC k, Sr.i , I' Janardhan Rc'c1c11,, Advocate [OPL|(-] Two CD (,optjc;

One sparc' ctl p't CHG kam PP\4,

HIGH COURT DATED:24/04t2):,-3 ./1;:'f'

tl \''

4i 4r (:-i - i1 a O ll tl Jlt{ 20Il j 1'

IUDGMENT AS.No.216 of 20l,!;

APPEAL SUIT I S DISMISSED FOR NONPROSECUTIO} {,"\C", ,\t\o