Akula Hymavathi, v. The State Of Telangana,

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR W.P.No.26659 of 2015 ORDER:

The 1st petitioner and the 4th respondent approached the 2nd respondent to decide the title dispute among them. Though such a dispute falls beyond the purview of the 2nd respondent, the 2nd respondent passed the order, dated 06-07-2015 recording certain findings and advised both the parties to approach the court of law and settle their dispute. Aggrieved by the findings recorded by the 2nd respondent, the petitioners have filed the present writ petition.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue.

In my view, there is no reason to entertain the writ petition, as the findings on title recorded by the 2nd respondent under the impugned order have hardly any evidentiary value and as such, if the petitioners or the 4th respondent approaches the competent civil court, the findings on title recorded by the 2nd respondent under the impugned order will not affect jurisdiction of the Civil Court to independently go into the question raised before it and decide the said issue. Therefore, there is no reason to entertain the writ petition, as the petitioners were already advised to approach competent court of law for appropriate relief. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

_______________________ VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR, J Date: 21-08-2015 Prv

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR W.P.No.26659 of 2015 21-08-2015 Prv