P. Padmaja Rani, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.By Its Principal Secretary,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH **** HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 25636 OF 2017 DATE OF ORDER: 02.08.2017 Between:

P. Padmaja Rani W/o J.V. Jithendra ....Petitioner A n d The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Registration-II) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi and three others ....Respondents

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 25636 OF 2017 ORDER:

Heard learned counsel appearing for petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignments. The petitioner in this writ petition complains against the respondents herein and pray for Mandamus declaring Memo No. 31617/Regn.II/A1/2012-4, dated 31.8.2015 and action of respondents in not considering the application of petitioner for renewal of licence to practice as Notary as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional.

Learned counsel rely upon common order dated 2.12.2016 in W.P.No. 9655 of 2016 and batch, wherein my learned brother Justice C. Praveen Kumar has considered the purport of Memo and the action of the respondents in not considering the applications filed for renewal and allowed the writ petitions.

Learned Government Pleader does not dispute the circumstances in the case on hand and submits that the principle laid down by this Court does not apply to the present cases.

I have perused the order and I am satisfied the instant writ petition can be allowed by following the order of this Court in W.P.No. 9655 of 2016 and batch dated 2.12.2016. The Writ Petition is accordingly allowed in terms of W.P.No. 9655 of 2016 and batch dated 2.12.2016. No order

as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed.

______________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J Date: 02.08.2017 KA