Pallela Chandu @ Besta Chandu @ Chapala Chandu-A.1 v. The State Of Telangana Through Kothur Police Station,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.6836 of 2026 DATE: 01.05.2026 BETWEEN:

Pallela Chandu @ Besta Chandu @ Chapala Chandu and another.

...petitioners/ accused Nos.1 and 2 And The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad.

Through Kothu Police Station.

.....Respondent

O R D E R

This Criminal Petition is filed praying this Court to enlarge the petitioners on bail who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.78 of 2026 before the Kothur Police Station, Future City Commissionerate, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 109 read with 3(5) of BNS. 2.

The brief facts of the case are that on 05.03.2026, the complainant reported that on the night of 04.03.2026, a minor collision occurred between their motorcycle and that of

Abhishek near Apollo Pharmacy, Kothur that led to a quarrel, during which Abhishek along with Chapala Chandu and Chapala Uday, assaulted them, due to which they received injuries. Later on the same night, at Kanaka Durga Bar, Kothur, the accused persons, along with Murari, again attacked the complainant with beer bottles, causing bleeding injuries to his head, face, and hand, for which he received treatment at Government Hospital, Shadnagar. The accused also threatened him with dire consequences, leading to the present complaint alleging assault and attempt to murder. 3.

Heard Sri E. Srinivas Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners as well as Sri M. Ramachandra Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent - State.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners have been in judicial custody 06.03.2026. The material part of the investigation is completed. The injuries sustained by the victim are simple in nature and he was also discharged from the hospital. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioners by allowing this Criminal Petition.

5.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners stating that the there are serious allegations against the petitioners. Further, the investigation was not yet completed. At this stage, granting of bail to the petitioners do not arise. Therefore, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition.

6.

In the light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and a perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the petitioners have been in judicial custody since 06.03.2026. As seen from the record, the material part of the investigation has been completed and charge sheet is also filed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, age of the petitioner and the incarceration period of the petitioner, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

i.

The petitioners/A.1 and A.2 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each, with two sureties for a like sum each to the

satisfaction of the learned Principal Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Shadnagar.

ii.

On such release, the petitioners/A.1 and A.2 shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) week or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.

iii.

The petitioners/A.1 and A.2 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.(presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS).

7.

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 01.05.2026 YVL