Smt. Yarava Venkata Aruna Kumari v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO WRIT PETITION No.13533 OF 2018 O R D E R:

Heard counsel for petitioner and Sri Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, Standing Counsel for respondents 2 and 5. 2.

It is stated by the counsel on both sides that the issue raised in the Writ Petition is covered by the order dt.29.08.2016 in W.P.No.28525 of 2016 and order dt.22.03.2018 in W.P.No.9396 of 2018.

3.

Therefore, for the reasons alike, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider the application of the petitioner for grant of building permission in the subject land within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, subject to the petitioner satisfying the requirements of Section 428 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and also subject to the petitioner giving an undertaking that the petitioner would not claim equities or costs of the building construction, in the event LGC No.29 of 2006 being decided against the petitioners, without reference to the letter dt.29.03.2018 of the 5th respondent. There shall be no order as to costs.

4.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand dismissed.

_____________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J 25th April, 2018.

gra