M. Chitti Babu v. Government Of A.P.
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
I 3302I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 16102 OF 2010 Between:
1. M. Chitti Babu, S/o Late tt/. David Raj Service No 2O4, Sri Ranga Apartments, Opp. Keyes High School, Secunderabad.
2. V. Jataj, S/o Late Victor Ex-Serviceman, Professional R/o Plot No. 6, West Venkatapuram' Alwal secunderabad ...pETrroNERS AND
1. Government of A.P., Rep. by its Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad
2. The District Collector, R.R. District, Hyderabad
3. Revenue Divisional Officer (East), Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad
4. Mandal Revenue Officer, Shamirpet, R.R,. District.
5. Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, Begumpet, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to alienate the land admeasuring 5 acres in Each Sy.No. held by the petitioners in SY.No. 22,23,and 310 situated in Jawahar Nagar, Shamirpet Mandal, R.R. District as arbitrary illegal, and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners. l.A. NO: 't OF 2010(WPMP.
NO: 20275 OF 20't0) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to issue interim directions directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from their lands in SY.No. 22, 23, & 310 admeasuring 5 acres in each Sy.No. situated in Jawahar Nagar,Shamirpet Mandal, R.R. District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C.M.R.VELU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5: M/s. D.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.161O2 of2O1O ORDER:
This petition is coming for hearing since 2O10. On 08.12.2023, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, and therefore the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption "for Dismissal". Even today, when the matter is callecl, thurc is no rcprcscrltalion on behalf of the petitioners. It sccms that thc pctitioncrs arc not intcrested to prosecutqthis case 2.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution/default. Thcre shall be no order as to CoStS 3.
Pcnding misccllancous applications, if anv in this petition, shall stand closed i SD/. P. PADMANABHA BEDDY ASSISTANT REGI$TRAR -I(\I \) SECTION OFFICER To 1. One CC to SRI C.M.R.VELU' Advocate [OPUC]
2. i;; cct to ci FoR REVENUE, High court for the state of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT One CC to M/s. D.
Two CD Copies //TRUE COPY// Loorou,, sc FoR HtvDA [,PUC] PSK.
GJP a"\{r-
HIGH COURT DATED:2911212023 TA16 S tl e)o L)
ORDER
-Z JAT 202[ L) WP.No.16102 of 2010 .r-'*.
* A1 * ll c DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION Fbri r.rorrr_pROSECUTIoN/ DEFAU LT WITHOUT COSTS.
r\>\^ +1b&-- 1l-\