Dudala Ramesh Goud v. The State Of Telangana
[ 32e6 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 16545 OF 2023 Between Dudala Ramesh Goud, Son of late Dudala Sudarshan Goud, Aged about 52 years, Occ. Business, resident of Quarter No.3-65-3, Weaker Section Colony, Khajaguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad, T.S.
...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2. The Director General of Police, Lakdi-ka-pool, Hyderabad.
3. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Hyderabad.
4. The Director General, Fire Services, Lakdi-ka-pool, Hyderabad.
5. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Hyderabad.
6. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Hyderabad.
7. The Station House Officer, Rayadurgam Police Station, Cyberabad, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to take necessary action on the representation dated 21 .O4.2023 made by the petitioner.
lA NO: I OF 2023 Petition under Section 'l 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to take necessary action on the representation dated 21 .O4.2023 made by the petitioner, pending disposal of the Writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. P RAVI SHANKER Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER
G-- '
'ta'j"/ fl:-'.
-./ I HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.16545 of2O23 ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the cause in the writ petition no longer survives and the relief sought in the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the above submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs SD/- K.AMMAJI ASSISTAN]LREGISTRAR C1p SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,
1. One CC to SRl. P RAVI SHANKER, Advocate [OPUC] 2.TwoCCstoGPFoRHoME,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad. [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies SB GJ AY
HIGH COURT DATED:1 610812023 ? rrArE I oi a tr [$ IEP tu v o .b .t'
t * D l- c :1-: f-l oc
ORDER
WP.No.16545 of 2023 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS X