Gaddam Sailoo v. The Special Grade Deputy Collector And

[ 32s6 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE SIXIEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 8899 OF 2005 Between:

'1 . Gaddam Sailoo, S/o. Late G. Babaiah , aged 68 years,

2. Gaddam Saomaiah, Sio. Late G. Babaiah , aged 63 years,

3. Gaddam Mallesha, S/o. Late G. Babaiah , aged 43 years,

4. Gaddam Krishna, S/o. Late G. Babaiah , aged 36 years,

5. Gaddam Durgaiah, Sio. Late G. Babaiah , aged 58 years, All are Agriculturists, Rl/o. Kuntloor Village, Hayathnagar lvlandal, Ranga ReddY District'

...pETrroNERS AND The Special Grade Deputy Collector And, Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy, East Division, Malakunta, Hyderabad.

The Dy. Collector & Mandal Revenue, Oflrcer, Hayathnagar Mandal, Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy District.

Chama Narsimha Reddy, S/o. Late Yadagiri @ Yadagiri Reddy Agriculture, RYo. Kuntloor Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Chama Pralap Reddy, S/o. Late Yadagiri @ Yadagiri Reddy Agriculture, FL/o. Kuntloor Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 1.

J.

4.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lMia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari declaring the impugned order in File No. A2l59Ol2OO5 dt.28-2-2OO5 issued by the Respondent No.1 as illegal, void and contrary and consequently quash the same and to pass such other order or orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

t.A. NO: 1 0F 2005 WPMP. NO: 11739 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order in File No. A2l590l2O0S dt. 28-2-2005 issued by the Respondent No.1 pending disposal of the Writ petition and to pass such other order or orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. N. VINESH RAJ Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 'l to 2: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.3&4: SRt RESU MAHENDER REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.8899 OF 2OO5 ORDER:

This writ petition is hled to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari declaring the impugned order in File No.A2/59O/2005 dated 28.O2.2OO5 issued by respondent No. I as illegal, void and contrar5r and consequently quash the same and to pass such other order or orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

2.

This matter was earlier listed on 71.10.2023. On the said date there was no representation for the petitioner and as such the matter was posted to 12.10.2023 under the caption for dismissal .

Onl2.IO.2O23 also there is no representation for the petitioner. However, the matter was finally posted to 16.10.2023. But today also there is no representation for petitioner.

3. In the present circumstances, this Court has no option except to dismiss the writ petition for nonprosecution.

MSK,J w.P.NO.aa99 0F 20()5 4.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecutlon. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed SD/.K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR az/ SECTION OFFICER To, //TRUE COPY'

1. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUTI

2. One CC to SRl. N. VINESH RAJ ,Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to SRI.RESU MAHENDER REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies BMSB *5\-

n I HIGH COURT DATED:1611012023 1H.E ST41 e ( e d oioErzozt o .b .Y

ORDER

e,jpl.i r.) :--j'- WP.No.8899 of 2005 DISMTSSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS \\'.!

1A \\ 1t