← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/32736/2015disposed of no costs

J. Arun Kumar, v. The State Of Telangana,

2015-10-28A V Sesha Sai4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY THE TWENTYEIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEEN PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION NO. 32736 OF 2015 Between:

J. Arun Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.

The State of Telangana Represented by its Prl.Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & Ors. ... Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Chetluru Sreenivas Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Home [TG] The Court made the following: [order follows] HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION NO. 32736 OF 2015

O R D E R :

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief : "To declare the action of the respondents as illegal, void, arbitrary and unjust in calling the petitioner and threatening the petitioner to pay amounts which the petitioner is not due and consequently to direct the respondent No.4 to take action against the respondent No.3 and further to direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to make any such threatening attempts for recovery of alleged due amounts without due process of law and to pass such other suitable orders as this court may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

2. Heard Sri Chetluru Sreenivas, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.

3. When the matter is called, written instructions dated 14/10/2015 furnished by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Amberpet Police Station, Hyderabad district have been placed by the learned Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.

3. The written instructions, reads as under: "It is submitted that the petitioner has not lodged any complaint on 03/10/2015 with Amberpet Police Station, Hyderabad. The Station records also reveal that the petitioner has not lodged complaint with the Police Station. Therefore, the allegations that "on 03/10/2015 he approached Police Station Amberpet

and lodged complaint with them to take action against the respondent No.3 but the policerefused to receive any complaint stating that the complaint is civil in nature" are baseless and denied and the said allegations have neen made only for the purpose of the writ petition. It is submitted that the writ petition is devoid of any merits and is liable to be dismissed."

4. On noticing the same, the learned counsel for the petitioner has requested this court to dispose of the writ petition by recording the said written instructions.

5. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of by recording the above written instructions furnished by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Amberpet Police Station, Hyderabad district. No costs.

6. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

​ _____________________ JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI 28/10/2015 I s L HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI

WRIT PETITION NO. 32736 OF 2015 Date:28/10/2015 Circulation No.

Court Master: I s L