S.Kasivisweswara Swamy Temple v. B.Reddeppa

HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER SECOND APPEAL No.474 OF 2000 JUDGMENT:

There is no representation for the appellant, in spite of the appeal being listed under the caption 'for orders'.

2. On earlier occasion also, there was no representation for both sides. It appears, the appellant has no interest to pursue the appeal.

3. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________________ Dr. SHAMEEM AKTHER, J June 21, 2018.

MD