Smt. G. Nirmala, v. The State Of Telangana, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary To

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO WRIT PETITION No.29853 of 2016 ORDER:

In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents 4 to 6 to forthwith initiate appropriate legal action against the respondents 2 & 3 in F.I.R.No.101 of 2016. The main grievance of the petitioner is to direct the respondentspolice to complete the investigation and final report in F.I.R.No.101 of 2016. Further the petitioner sought for a direction to the respondentspolice to give her police protection since she apprehends danger in the hands of respondents 2 & 3.

This Court heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, counsel for respondents 2 & 3 and learned Government Pleader for Home and perused the material available on record.

As far as the prayer of the petitioner regarding the completion of investigation and filing of charge sheet is concerned, learned counsel appearing for respondents 2 & 3 brought to the notice of this Court that already the investigation in all the cases which were registered basing on the complaints lodged by the petitioner, is completed and the charge sheets were also filed and that the respondents 2 & 3 are facing trial before the Court concerned. In view of the said submission, no orders need be passed for completion of investigation. However, it is to be observed that in these type of cases, it is necessary that the cases should be disposed of at an early date. Hence, the Court concerned is directed to dispose of the cases that are arising out of the complaints lodged by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible.

As far as the prayer of police protection to the petitioner is concerned, it is always left open to the respondents-police, who are aware of the facts and circumstances of cases, to look into the matter which necessitated the petitioner to file a petition seeking police protection. The learned counsel for the respondents 2 & 3 submitted that, in fact, the respondents 2 & 3 are under apprehension that the petitioner may cause danger to their life and liberty. In the circumstances, this Court is of the view that any such representation is made either by the petitioner or by the respondents 2 & 3, it is for the respondents 4 to 6 to consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law.

With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. The petitioner is directed to communicate a copy of this order to the Court, where the relevant cases are pending. No order as to costs. Pending Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _________________ RAJA ELANGO,J 27.10.2016.

Tsr