← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/40769/2014closed no costs

Deeti Ravi, v. The State Of Telangana,

2018-11-12P.Keshava Rao2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 40769 OF 2014 ORDER:

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

The prayer sought in the Writ Petition is as under: " ....to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rdd respondents in interfering with our possession of the land in an extent of 1458 Sq. Yds in Sy. No. 208 of Mancherial Town, Adilabad District at the instance of respondent No.4 as highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and interfering in civil disputes and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to interfere with civil disputes." 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners strenuously contended that respondent Nos. 2 and 3, without there being any authority of law, are trying to interfering with their possession over the subject property.

4.

Learned GP appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, placed on record, the written instructions dated 12.11.2018 issued by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Mancherial P.S., stating that on the complaint lodged by respondent No.4, a case in Cr.No.541 of 2014 for the offence under Sections 420 and 506 IPC has been registered against the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 and eight others. After investigation, a charge sheet has been filed. The Court below, after taking cognizance of the said offence, numbered the same as CC.No.267 of 2017 on the file of the Court of learned Special Judicial First Class Magistrate for Excise cases, Mancherial. It is also mentioned in the said written instructions that during the course of investigation, the petitioners were called to the police station after

issuance of Section 41-A Cr.P.C. notices by respondent No.3. Respondent No.2 never interfered in the possession of the petitioners and they have nothing to do with the civil disputes between them and others.

5.

The written instructions are made part of the record. 6.

In the light of the above, this Court is of the opinion that no further orders are required in the Writ Petition. 7.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed. No order as to costs.

__________________ P. KESHAVA RAO,J Date: 12.11.2018 KPM