Maddi Raghavendra Venkata Ratna Tej v. Maddi Seshagiri Rao And 6 Otehrs

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6173 of 2012 ORDER:

Heard Mr.Venkatesh holding for Mr.E.Ajay Reddy states that Mr.E.Ajay Reddy has returned the brief with consent to revision petitioner. Hence, Mr.E.Ajay Reddy is not appearing. I have perused the record and the record does not disclose that the revision petitioner has engaged another Advocate in the place of Mr.E.Ajay Reddy.

The Civil Revision Petition underwent as many as eight adjournments.

For the above reasons, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________ S. V. BHATT, J Dt: 07-09-2018 Prv