The State Bank Of Hyderabad v. G.Venkatesham

[ 32081 rN rHE HrGH couRr Ffl$rtffoBtsE oF TELANGANA N ovEMB ER 1rr 6soAy rH E rw5lll S=^R8\?rKloF PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P'SREE SUDHA 40F APPEAL SUIT NO: 119 passed bY the Court of the Senior Appeal against the Judgment and Decree Civil Judge, Peddapalli in O'S'No 32 of 1998 dt:91-2003 l I Between:

by Manager, Branch JYothinagar'

The Stdte Bank of HYderabad' reP'

Ramagundam ...APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF AND Gundeti Venkatesham' S/o Gattaiah' Aged 69 years' Occ: Business R/o 1.

Ei6^si, 6;0, Centenary colonv' Kamanpur'

...RESPONDENT No' 1/DEFENDANT No' 1 Gundeti Pullaiah, S/o Gattaiah' Occ: Business' 74 Years' Rio H'No'3-6-66' Peddapallv 2.

...RES..NDENT No' ,DEFENDANT No' 2 Counsel for the Appellant: SRI' P' PRAKASH RAJ Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA A.S.No.1 794 of 20o3 JUDG When the matter is taken up for hearing, there 15 no representation for the appellant.

On 26.10.2022, there is no representation for the appellant ald therefore, the matter was directed to be Iisted under the caption Tor dismissal,. Today a-lso, there is no representation for the appellant. Therefore, this Court is of the considered view that the appellant is not interested to pursue the litigation.

Hence, the Appeal 1S dismissed for non_ prosecution. No costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/.K.SAILESHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII \ SECTION OFFICER To '1 . The Senior Civil Judge, Pedapalli

2. One CC to SRI P. PRAKASH RAJ' Advocate [oPUC]

3. Two CD CoPies VH \k

HIGH COURT DATED: 2211112022 (,;

JUDGMENT

2 0 APh 2I}2?

ll r-r \'

AS.No.1194 of 2003 -,:

DISMISSING THE APPEAL FOR NON.PROSEGUTION \\ 3 *