Ramapuram Gram Panchayat, v. The State Of Telangana,

I f I I \ i I i I [ 33021 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Originat Jurisdiction) t i i I FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO IHOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR j PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 39263 0F 20't4 Between:

Ramapuram Gram Panchayat, rep. by its Sarpanch Chinthamalla Saidulu, S/o: Late. Ramaswamy ag_irO St yeais, Ramdpuram village NereOuCnerid Mandal, Nalgonda District, T.S.

...PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, r.ep by its Principal Secretary, panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

1.

The District Collector, Nalgonda District Nalgonda, Telangana State. The District Panchayat Officer, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda,T_S. The Sub-Registrar, Huzurnagar Town And Mandal, Nalgonda District, T.S. The Tahsildar, Nereducherla Mandal, Nalgonda District, T.S. Nereducherla Gram Panchayat, rep. by its Sarpanch/Secretary, Nereducherla Gram Panchayat, village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, T.S. ' ...

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the inaction of the respondent authorities in allotting the lands along with its transactions and cess amounts pertaining to the lands fallen within the jurisdiction of the Ramapuram Gram Panchayat despite the letter of the 5th respondent bearing Lr.No.B/6368/2014 dt.26-11-2014 as per the List appended to it, and though the petitioner gram panchayat was bifurcated from the 6rh respondent gram panchayat way back in the year 1983, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and to grant.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 49254OF 20141 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the respondent no.4 herein to implement the orders of the Sth respondent vide Lr.No.B/636812O14 dt.26.11.2014, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PALLE NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1 and 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No. 2,4 and 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI P. RAGHAVENDER REDDY, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.39263 of 2Ot4 ORDER:

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing the learned Counsel for petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and thereby the Writ Petition has become infructuous.

2.

Recording the aforementioned submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

3. As sequel to it, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any'

shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

SD/- T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to Sri Palle Nageswar Rao, Advocate [OPUC] a.i*sE:irtrBlg:fl :f; :i:ln:ig'.:,:''3:}:1i;'fiJlll[,of,Y31,n,o,,n" - State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] +. i','il-ctd iJCl; toi nev6nue, Higti cou-rt tor the State of Telangana' at Hyderabad [OUTI

5. Two CD CoPies TJ GJP

j I HIGH COURT DATED:1210112024

ORDER

WP.No.39263 ot 2014 14:

e o 1HE SI4 0 7 ni,R 2024 i * * ,\l U ')- 'sPATcHEO DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

e)*'

W