Azmeera Lakpathy v. The State Of Telangana
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO wRtT PET|T|ON NO. 19052 0F 2020 Between:
Azmeera Lakpathy, S/o. Somla, Aged 42 years, Fl/o. Flat No. 204, H.No. 16-1 174019171204, Ranjeeth Towers, Dilsukh Nagar, Hyderabad. ,..PETITIONER AND '1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2. The Director General of Police, Government of Telangana, Hyderabad.
3. The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad.
4. The Station House Officer, Ivlalakpet Police Station, Hyderabad.
5. Sri. Gutta Narasimha Reddy, S/o. Ramakrishna Reddy, R/o. H.No. 16-1174019171204, Ranjeeth Towers, Dilsukh Nagar, Hyderabad. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the 4rh respondent in interfering with the possession of the petitioner and demanding the petitioner by threatening him to vacate the said Flat i.e. Flat No. 204, H.No. 16-1 1-74019171204, Ranjeeth Towers, Dilsukh Nagar, Hyderabad, without following due process of law, as highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the principles of natural justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant lnterim directions, directing the 4th and sth respondents not to interfere with the possession of the property bearing Flat No. 204, H.No. 16-11-74019t71204, Ranjeeth Towers, Dilsukh Nagar, Hyderabad, without following due process of law, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt T. VENKATESHWARLU (NOT APPEARED) Counsel for the Respondents: AGp FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITIONNo.1905 OF 2020
ORDER
The Court, having noticed that there was no representation for the Petitioner on three occasions and also there was no representation when the case was called on 2l '12 '2O2O ' to give one more opportunity to the petitioner' directed the matter to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'' Today also when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner though the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal'' the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the It apPears, writ petition.
2, The writ Petition 1S accordinglY dismissed for nonprosecution. Pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed' SD/-B.SATY AV ASSISTANT EG RAR \ ,TRUE COPY// SE N OFFICER t"'1.
?,lB 33ji".AI,Yi?lg3:H.A'r""tl1"r'#irt:5,:3orreransana at Hvderabad tOUTl two CD CoPies.
o MP
HIGH COURT DATED:2911212020 t tA s ( oo 0 TJAit 2021 f,
ORDER
gg PAT * o WP.No.19052 o12020 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON '
PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS )