Shaik Peervali, v. The State Of Telangana, Rep. By Public Prosecutor,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITION No.7559 of 2026 Date: 14.05.2026 Between:

Shaik Peervali ..Petitioner/Accused No.3 And The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, Through SHO, PS Pocharam, IT Corridor. ..Respondent : O R D E R :

The petitioner-accused No.3 filed the present application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to grant bail to him in Crime No.605 of 2025 of Pocharam IT Corridor Police Station, Rachakonda, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8(C) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'NDPS Act').

2.

Heard Mr.L.Sai Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Vivekananda Reddy, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State. 3.

The allegation against the petitioner/accused No.3 is that he along with other accused was found in possession of 52 kgs of dry Ganja.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. As per the remand case diary, there are no specific allegations against the petitioner and the ingredients of the offences alleged against him are not made out. It is further submitted that the entire investigation is completed and all the material witnesses are examined, except filing of the charge sheet and the petitioner is in judicial custody since 31.12.2025 and since then he is in judicial custody and he is not having criminal antecedents. Hence, learned counsel prayed this Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

5.

On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor opposed for grant of bail stating that specific allegations are levelled against the petitioner.

6.

In the light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and on a perusal of the material on record, it is evident that the material part of the investigation has been completed and the petitioner has been in judicial custody for more than 134 days. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the incarceration period of the petitioner, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner/accused No.3, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the V

Additional Metropolitan Magistrate-cum-I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Malkajgiri-Medchal District, Uppal at L.B.Nagar. Sessions Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at Kushaiguda. (ii) The petitioner shall abide by the other conditions stipulated in Section 480(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and co-operate with the Investigating Officer in investigating the case.

(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Investigating Officer on every Monday between 09:00 a.m., and 05:00 p.m., for a period of eight (8) weeks or till the filing of the charge sheet, whichever is earlier and thereafter as and when required.

7.

Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is allowed. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________ JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI 14.05.2026 vsl/dpm

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITION No.7559 of 2026 Date: 14.05.2026 vsl/dpm