Kandi Ganeshwar, v. The State Of Telangana,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.7094 of 2026 DATE: 08.06.2026 Between:

Kandi Ganeshwar S/o Kandi Kistaiah

...Petitioner

AND The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Pubic Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana.

Hyderabad.

.... Respondent

O R D E R

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in an unregistered crime No.___ of 2026 on the file of file of PS Chandanagar, R.C.Puram. 2.

Heard Sri Rajagopallavan Tayi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M.Ramachandra Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State. 3.

The case of the prosecution is that on 28.10.2025, the de facto complainant lodged a report before police, wherein it is stated that some of the accused persons i.e., accused Nos.1 to 9 had fabricated false documents in furtherance of their common intention and conspiracy, criminally trespassed into the Government land situated in Survey Nos.373 to 375 of

- 2 - Chandanagar Village, which was allotted to Community Hall and Park. Basing on the same the aforesaid case was registered. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the petitioner is not arrayed as an accused, it is mentioned in the Remand report that an amount of Rs.28.5 lakhs was paid to the petitioner. He further submits that police are trying to arrest the petitioner; that earlier the petitioner filed anticipatory bail, wherein the contention of learned Additional Public Prosecutor is that the petitioner is not arrayed as an accused and recording the same, this Court dismissed the said application. He further submits the petitioner has threat in the hands of the petitioner and hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner. 5.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the same and submits that since the petitioner herein is not arrayed as an accused, there is no threat to the petitioner and hence, this petition is not maintainable and he prays to dismiss the petition.

6.

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for both parties, it is seen that the remand report does not refer to the name of petitioner, however, it is mentioned that the petitioner has received an amount of Rs.28.5 lakhs. But, there is no allegation that he has forged any document. Considering the above aspects, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

- 3 - (i) The petitioner-accused shall surrender before the Station House Officer, Chandanagar Police Station, Cyberabad, Rangas Reddy District, within two (2) weeks from today, and on such surrender, the petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each. (ii) On such release, the petitioner shall appear before the concerned Investigating Officer on every Wednesday between 09:00 a.m, and 05:00 p.m., for a period of eight (8) weeks or till the filing of the charge sheet, whichever is earlier, and thereafter, as and when required.

(iii) The petitioner shall abide by the other conditions stipulated in Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and co-operate with the Investigating Officer in investigating the case.

7.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 08.06.2026 YVL