High Court for State of TelanganaWP/23103/2015disposed of no costs

Pinniboyina Gopi Raju v. State Of Andhra Pradesh

2015-08-03Vilas V.Afzulpurkar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * * * * WRIT PETITION No.23103 OF 2015 Between:

Pinniboyina Gopi Raju .. Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 03.08.2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers Yes/No may be allowed to see the Judgment?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No marked to Law Reporters/Journals

3. Whether Their Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment? Yes/No THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.23103 OF 2015 ORDER:

The grievance of the petitioner in this Writ Petition is that respondents 2 and 3 are making corrections in the revenue records by incorporating the name of the 4th respondent and deleting the name of the petitioner even after considering the legal

notice, dated 06.10.2014.

When the Writ Petition was heard on 27.07.2015, it was noticed that there was no application filed by the petitioner seeking correction of entries in the revenue records, as the said notice cannot be treated as an application on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner was given liberty to make appropriate application before the Tahsildar, Veerullapadu Mandal, Krishna District, the 3rd respondent. Even today, learned counsel for the petitioner is not able to state as to whether any such application is made by the petitioner seeking correction of entries in revenue records and incorporation of his name with regard to the land admeasuring Ac.1.63 cents in R.S.No.72 of Gudemmadhavaram Village, Krishna District.

In view of the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to make appropriate application along with the supporting documents and if any such application is filed by the petitioner, the 3rd respondent is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, after giving notice to the affected parties. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ____________________________ VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR, J 03.08.2015 KH