← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/21433/2016disposed of no costs

Nallabothula Lakshmi, v. The State Of Telangana, Revenue Department, Rep. By Its

2016-07-04A.Rajasheker Reddy2 pages

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21433 OF 2016 ORDER:

The case of the petitioners is that their father during his life time executed a registered gift deed vide No.594/2014 of S.R.O, Sathupalli dated 05.03.2014 in respect of wet land to an extent of Ac.0.20 guntas in Survey No.159/R and a registered gift deed vide No.595/2014 of SRO, Sathupalli dated 05.3.2014 in respect of Ac.0.05 guntas which is equivalent to 605 Sq.Yrds in Survey no.1090/A located in Kandukuru Revenue Village, Vemsoor Mandal and that the said properties were gifted to the petitioners by his father out of love and affection and they were in possession of the said properties. Petitioners' father also executed a will deed in their favour bequeathing land to an extent of Ac.2.08 guntas in Survey No.1132 of Kandukuru Revenue Village, equally. Thereafter, petitioners' father died on 25.06.2014.

After his death petitioners immediately made applications to the 4th respondent to mutate their names in record of rights in respect of the above said properties which were gifted and bequeathed to the petitioners and to initiate ROR proceedings in respect of the said lands, but the respondents postponed the matter on different pretexts. Later the petitioners came to know that the names of their brother, his wife and daughters were entered in the possessor column of the revenue records in respect of the aforesaid properties which were gifted and bequeathed to the petitioners. Thereafter, petitioners made application to the respondents to delete the names of their brother's family, whose names were entered without following due procedure and to enter their names.

But the respondents did not take any action, as such, the petitioners sent a legal notice dated 09.06.2015 to the respondents. But, as no action is being taken, present writ petition is filed.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

Since it is stated that application of the petitioners for mutation of their names in the revenue records is pending before the 4th respondent, the 4th respondent is directed to dispose of the application of the petitioners in accordance with law after issuing notice to the affected parties within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the

petitioners.

With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

As a sequel to the disposal of this petition, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

_________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J 04.07.2016 tk