Dr. B.N. Biswal v. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) I FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO; 20016 OF 2021 Between:
1. Dr. B.N. Biswal, S/o.Bamdeb Biswal, aged about. 70 years, Occ.Retired Employee,residents of H.No.B -4-3781811 and 8-4-3781111, Sultanbagh, New Shastry Nagar, Eerragadda, Hyderabad.
2. Smt. Kabita Rani Biswal, W/o B.N. Biswal, Aged about. 66 years, Occ. Household residents of H.No.8-4-378/8/1 and 8-4-3781111 , Sultanbagh, New Shastry Nagar, Eerragadda, Hyderabad.
I ...PETITIONERS AND
1. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Commissioner, BRK Bhavan, Hyderabad, Telangana State.
2. The Deputy Commissioner, Circle 19, Yousufguda, GHMC Hyderabad, Telangana State.
3. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 o'f lhe Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the alleged demand notice dated.03lO2l2O21 to the petitioners without following the Section. 2o2(1)(bb) GHMC Act and without considering the order judgment and decree in M.A. No. 86/2003 dated 711112005 passed by the Honourable Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to G.O. MS No. 468 MA dated 3110711993 and Section.2O2 of the GHI\4C Act and set aside the same consequently by directing the respondents to re-fix / reassess the property tax considering Sec.202 of the GHMC Act and also taking into consideration of the nature of building at present.
.,.
LA.NO:1 OF 2021 Petition Under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to re-fix / reassess the property tax by suspending the demand notice dated 0310212021 considering the Section- 202 GHMC Act and taking into consideration of the nature of building at present, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : SRI.PASHAM KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : G.P FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION The Court made the following ORDER
/ HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION No.20016 of 2021
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a letter dated 27 -07 -2022 seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this writ petition, shall stand dismissed.
SD/.K.AMMAJI \ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,_4, i, \,tl-.
SECTION OFFICEh \ / //TRUE COPY// To 1 . Two CC to G.P FOR MUN|CIPAL ADI\4|N|STRAT|ON, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. (OUT) . One CC to SR|.A.RAJASUEXAR ieOoy, Advocate IopUCl . One CC to SRI.pASHA^, KRTSHNA neobV, novoir'L 1oeUc1 . Two CD Copies . One spare copy J S.A BS n\w
HIGH COURT DATED:2910712022 sr.
ORDER
.) 0 5 SFP ?l1r7 WP.No.20016 of 2021 ,,, DISMISSING THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
o I