Naralasetty Prasanna Kumar S/O Sriman Narayana, v. The State Of A.P.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Crl.P.M.P.No.2413 of 2015 in Crl.P.No.15451 of 2014 and Criminal Petition No.15451 of 2014 COMMON ORDER:
The defacto complainant and her counsel Smt.M.Vasantha are present. A.1 to A.4 and their Counsel Sri Venkateswarlu Sanisetty are present.
On the report given by defacto complainant, the Police of S.N.Puram P.S, Vijayawada City, registered FIR No.767 of 2013 against the accused for the offences under Sec.498-A IPC and investigation is reported to be pending.
While-so, both parties and their counsel appeared before Court today and submitted that at the intervention of elders, they have amicably resolved their disputes and as per the terms of their agreement, the defacto complainant and A.1 proposed to obtain divorce and in fact they have filed Divorce O.P.No.711 of 2014 before the Judge, Family Court, Vijayawada which is pending and the maintenance claim of the defacto complainant is also taken care and A.1 agreed to pay a sum of Rs.8,00,000/- to her in two installments i.e, they have already paid Rs.4,00,000/- at the time of institution of O.P.No.711 of 2014 and agreed to pay the balance amount at the time of obtaining divorce by mutual consent and as such the defacto complainant has no objection for quashment of the proceedings in Crime No.767 of 2013 on the file of S.N.Puram P.
S, Vijayawada City and so the Court may be pleased to accord permission to compound the offence and quash the proceedings in the interest of justice.
decision reported in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another, this petition is allowed and permission is accorded to the parties to compound the offence and consequently proceedings in Crime No.767 of 2013 on the file of S.N.Puram P.S, Vijayawada City, are hereby quashed.
In the result, both the petitions are accordingly allowed. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J Date: 17.03.2015 scs