Shaik Abdul Rabbani, v. The State Of Telangana,

HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE P. KESHAVA RAO W RI T PETI TI ON No.1 9 8 9 5 of 2 0 1 4 ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 5. 2.

The prayer sought in the writ petition is as under: "... this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents to arrest the petitioners without registering FIR for offence under section 498-A IPC and section 3, 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondent to follow the arrest procedure as directed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar in criminal appeal No.1277/ 2014 and be pleased to pass such other order or order/ s as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice."

3.

The learned Government Pleader, during the course of hearing, brought to the notice of this Court that pursuant to the registration of the crime, investigation was completed and a charge sheet was filed. The same was taken on file as C.C.No.1030 of 2016 and the same is pending trial. The matter is posted to 24.12.2019 for examination of L.W.3.

4.

In that view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that no further cause would survive in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

There shall be no order as to costs.

________________ P. KESHAVA RAO, J December 16, 2019 DSK