M/S.Raja Restaurant And Bar, Il-Iib Licencee v. The State Of Telangana, Represented By Its Principal

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 5707 OF 2016 Betwee n:

M/s.Raja Restaurant and Bar, lL-llB licencee, premises bearing No. 9-1-2911 and 9-1-201411, Ground Floor at Langar House, Hyderabad, represented by Dhanraj Singh S/o.Lakhan Lal, aged about 49 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.13-22701 Al 4, Upper Dhoolpet, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal, Secretary, Revenue (Excise-ll) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Telangana State, Excise Bhavan, Opp: Exhibition Grounds Nampally, Hyderabad.

3. The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent Hyderabad. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings in Cr.No.B1/675120151Esh. dt. 28.12.2015 passed by the 3rd respondent whereby directing the petitioner to shift the business premises of the petitioner i.e., M/s.Raja Restaurant and Bar at premises No. 9-1-2911 and 9-1-20lAl1 , Ground Floor, Langar House, Hyderabad to 100 meters away from the nearest and end point of National Highway /State High Way, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of provisions of A.P.Excise Act and Rules made thereunder, and consequently to set aside the afore said order, l.A.

NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO:7262 OF 20161 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings in Cr. No. B1/675/2015/Esh dated 2B-12-2015 passed by the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. A PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PROHIBITION and EXCISE The Court made the following: ORDER.

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No. 57O7 of 2016 ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further for consideratior-r by this Court and thus, the Writ petition has become infructuous.

2.

Recorcling the said submission, this Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs 3.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

I .t SD/.M.MANJULA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /'LW) l :

//TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER \ To,

1. One CC to SRl. A PRABHAKAR RAO, Advocate [OPUC] TwoCCstoGPFORPROHIBIT|ONandEXCISE,HighCourtfortheStateof Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies J.

One Spare Copy h'-- I ri 4.

PB I MMA

., <5{a , ,::

t l HIGH COU :

I i i .1 DATED: 25t04t2022 o 't hiL: Si4 t

ORDER

{) (a 2 7 lu[ 2022 WP.No.S707 of 201 * S r ,1711 I€O i t DISMISSING.OF THE.WR IT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT"

.1 ar-\l7 .t rn rh i|- r.<\u\,"

l