← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRP/519/2013dismissed as infructuous

Vangala Paramanandam v. Mamidishetty Sambaiah And ANR

2022-03-31P.Sree Sudha4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 519 OF 2013 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated.3}.11.2012 passed in 1.A.No.316 of 2011 in l.A.No.2B of 2010 in O.S.No.11 ot 2010 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Parkal, Warangal District.

Between:

Vangala Paramanandam, Sio.Rathaiah, Occ: Gold Smith R/o.5-198, Parkal Village and Mandal, Warangal District.

...Petitioners/Petitioners/Defendant-2

AND '1 . Mamidishetty Sambaiah, S/o.Veeramallu, Occ: Tailor, R/o.Main Road, Parkal Village and Mandal, Warangal District. ... RespondenURespondent/Plaintiff I

2. Mohd.Khaza Zainathuddin, S/o.Mohd.Khasim, Occ: Retd Employee, Rlo.2-4, Main Road, Village and Mandal, Warangal District, (2nd Respondent is not a necessary party).

..,RespondenURespondent/Defendant-1 l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013( CRPMP. NO: 687 OF 2013) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings in OS No.1 1 of 2O1O dated 30.1 1.2012 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Parkal, pending disposal of the main Civil Revision Petition.

l.A. NO: 4 OF 2013(CRPMP . NO:3480 OF 2013) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court in CRP No.519 of 201 3 dated: 1410212013.

Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s S. A. V. RATNAM Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI AJAY KUMAR MADISETTY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: --------- The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.S19 OF 2013 ORDER:

I This civil revision petition is filed assailing the orders / dated 30. ll.2Ol2 in I.A.No.316 ol 2011 in LA No.28 of 201O in I J i O.S.No. 11of 2Ol0 on the I'ile of the Junior Civil Judge at Parkal. i 2.

As per the case status information, 0.S.No. 1 1 of 2O l0 was dismissed for default on 29.03.2018 itself. 3.

[n view of the same, as no cause survives, this civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed.

SD/-K.ONESIM ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 6e SECTION OFFICER To, \ \ The Junior Civil Judge, at Parkal, Warangal District One CC to M/s S. A. V. Ratnam, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. Ajay Kumar Madisetty, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies One Spare Copy MMK SB- V I J

HIGH COURT DATED:31 10312022 1 s 5'[^;

/t\ j ') 'J c i 19 JUt ?[2 -a PA1I,\

ORDER

CRP.No.519 of 2013 DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETTTION AS INFRUCTUOUS $A,-