← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/40269/2012disposed of no costs

N. Seetharam Reddy v. The State Of A.P. Represented By The District Collector,

2016-08-27S.V.Bhatt2 pages

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT W.P.No.40269 OF 2012 ORDER:

The petitioner prays for the following relief: ".......this Hon'ble court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the second respondent in mutating the land admeasuring Ac.0.21 Gts situated in Sy.No. 991 of Parkal Village and Mandal, Warangal District in favour of the petitioner as acquired under Registered sale deed document No.1995/95 dated 13.3.1995, as bad, arbitrary, capricious and illegal with a consequential direction to direct the second respondent to sanction mutation of the land acquired by the petitioner situated in Sy.No. 991 of Parkal Village and Mandal, Warangal District by issuing Pattadar pass book and title deed in the interest of justice and pass......."

Heard Smt.Vijaya Lakshmi for petitioner and Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

The Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, states that the representation said to have been filed by petitioner is not available and secondly the representation is not in the prescribed form under the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971. He further states that if the petitioner applies to 2nd respondent under the prescribed form, the 2nd respondent will examine and pass orders expeditiously.

The counsel for petitioner agrees the request to file representation in the prescribed form.

Hence, the writ petition is disposed of by this order. The petitioner is given liberty to apply to 2nd respondent for mutation of his name to an extent of Ac.0-21 gts in Sy.No.991 of Parkal Village and Mandal, Warangal District, within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is given liberty to

communicate copy of this order along with the proposed request for mutation.

The 2nd respondent is directed to consider the request of petitioner and take a decision within eight weeks thereafter. It is made clear that merits of the matter are to be considered by the 2nd respondent and the 2nd respondent follows the procedure prescribed by law in this behalf while considering the request of petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, stand closed.

____________ S.V.BHATT, J Dt.27.08.2016 Lrkm