Yadamma v. Jairam Reddy
I l32s4l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAN
AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY Appeal under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment ahd decree dated 0910612014 made in AS No.26 0f 2009 0n the file of the court of the I Additional District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy prefened against the decree in OS No.86 of 2005 dated 16/03/2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Sangareddy.
'1. Smt Yadamma, (died per LRs) Wo late Bal Reddy D/o late Janga Reddy Aged about 54 yrs Occ: Agriculure R/o 16-1 08 Bombay Colony Ramachandrapuram
2. Midderla Gopdt neddy, S/o. late Bal Reddy, Occ: Agriculture, Fl/o. 16-108' Bombay Colony, Ramachandapuram of the deceased sole (AppellantNo.2 is brought on record S No,3/2017) Appellant vide Court Order dated 01 ...APPE LLANTS/APPELLANT/ PLAINTIFF ANE as per LRs lO2l2O2inl 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Wo late Chinna Mallareddy, Aged about 60 years Occ: 11.S House hold 12.K.Srinivas Reddy, S/o late Chinna Mallareddy, Aged about 28 years Occ: Agriculture 13.Sht P.Padinavathi, Wo. Krishna Reddy, D/o. late Chinna Mallareddy, Aged about 40vears.Occ: House hold l4.Smt.Nimialamina, Wo.Srinivas Reddy, D/o. late Chinna Mallareddy Aged about 35 years, Occ: House hold
R11 to R14 are resident of H.No.8-52, Tellapur Village, R.C.Puram Mandal, Medak District.) ...RESPONDENTS/ DEFE NDANTS SAMP. NO: 2271 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to grant ad-interim injunction restraining the Respondents, their men and agents from alienating the suit schedule properties or creating charge over the same, pending disposal of the second appeal For the Appellants : SRI P.VENKAT REDDY, Advocate (not present) For the Respondent Nos.l ,2,11,12 : SRI ERANKI PHANI KUMAR, Advocate For the Respondent Nos.6 & I : SRI VENKATESWERLLU KESAMSETTY, Advocate The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
THEHoN'BLEsMTJUSTICEG.ANUPAMACHAKRAVARTHY S.A No.799 of 2014 JUDGMENT:
The second appeal relates to the year,2O14 and it is still coming up under the caption "for admission." The matter underwent numerous adjournments and on 28'lO'2O22, the matter was adjourned on the ground. of illness of the learned counsel for the appellant with a condition that no further adjournment will be granted'
On0l.ll.2o22,therewasnorepresentationforthe appellant either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. Therefore, this court was constrained to list the matter under the caption "for dismissal" on 02.11.2022'
Today i.e., 02.11.2022, the learned counsel for the respondents reported that he is ready to argue the matter' however there is no representation for the appellant either in the forenoon or in the afternoon'
Therefore, the second Appeal is dismissed for default and for non-Prosecution. No costs'
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Second Appeal, shall stand closed.
SA/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT //TRUE COPYII II SECTION OFFICER To
1. The
2. The t Additional District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy. Senior Civil Judge, SangareddY.
CC to Sri P.Venkat Reddy, Advocate [OPUCI CC to Sri Eranki Phani Kumar, Advocate [OPUel CC to SriVenkateswarlu Kesamsetty, Advocate [OPUC] CD Copies
3. One
4. One
5. One
6. Two Kj
HIGH COURT DATED:0211112022 ..
(.1 s r.E:
€ t, .
dl }P'i;
i..'
-Fr
JUDGMENT
ii SA.No.799 of 2014 DISMISSING THE SA FOR DEFAULT AND FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.