Dr.K.Subrahmanyam, v. The A.P. Eastern Power Districubtion Co., Ltd.,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.10264 of 2005 ORDER:

Heard Dr. P.B. Vijay Kumar for petitioner. No representation for respondents.

2. The petitioner challenges the provisional assessment notice No.VSP/005/00347/05 dated 18.03.2005.

3. Respondents in para 5 of the counter state that provisional assessment notice dated 18.03.2005 was issued and petitioner was directed to deposit Rs.26,973/- for restoration of the power supply. Respondents admit that the petitioner deposited the amount.

4. According to petitioner, as a matter of fact, there is no pilferage of energy. This matter requires consideration and passing of appropriate orders by the fourth respondent.

5. The petitioner is given four (4) weeks time from today to file representation before the fourth respondent and the fourth respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders within four (4) weeks thereafter. Till a decision is taken and communicated, status quo, as on date, is directed to be maintained. The writ petition is disposed of as indicated above. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

____________ S. V. BHATT, J June 14, 2016 DSK