The Nagarjuna Grameena Bank Khammam v. T.Sarangapani And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOTJR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI SECOND APPEAL NO:724OF 2oo2 Appeal filed under section 100 of CPC, against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.12.1994 passed in A.S. No.40 of 1991 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Khammam, by Confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 30.03.1991 passed in O.S. No.159 of 1983 on the file of the ll Additional District Munsif, Khammam.

Between:

The Nagarjuna Grameena Bank Khammam, Rep by its Branch Manager, Khamrnam ...APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAI NTIFF AND t. t.Sarangapani, S/o Suraiah, 53 Yrs, Employee, Ri/o Rotarynagar, Khammam

2. B.Ramarao, S/o Simhadri, Major, Employee, Q.No.71, Rotarynagar, Khammam

3. K.K.Mohanrao, S/o Anantharamulu, 39 Yrs., business, Nolampan Shop, BusStand, Road, Khammam. ...RESPONDENT (Respondent Nos: 2 & 3, dismissed for default, Mde Court Order Dated: 1610-2001 jn CMP.No. 12062 of 1996 in SASR.No.'17829 of 1996) Counsel for the Appellant(s) :

SRI A ADINARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondents :

K B R KRISHNA MURTHY The Court made the following :

ORDER

/ THE ITON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M.G. PRIYADARSINI SECOND APPEAL No.724 of2OO2 JUDGMENT:

Sri B. Adinarayana Rao, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the decreetal amount has been received and the subject matter of the appeal has become infructuous.

Recording the said submission of the learned counsel, the Second Appeal is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaleous applications, if any, pending shall stattd qlased. XLo order as to costs, Sd/- B. SATYAVATHI DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// sebrror oFFrcER To,

1. The Additional District Judge, Karimnagar

2. The llAdditional District Munsif, Khammam

3. One CC to Sri B Adinarayana Rao Advocate [OPUC]

4. One CC to Sri K B R Krishna Murthy Advocate [OPUCI

5. Two CD Copies AAlghuv

i,!, 1..i.w .f,..

HIGH COURT DATED: 26t03t2024 1\ i S-rA rC o ( '9, ' -') I:r [ 5 l,JN ?ut Ct, ,5 1

ORDER

*,,, ,/ SA.No.724 of 2002 DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAI AS INFRUCTUOUI WITHOUT COSTS