← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/11189/2015dismissed

Avula Veera Sekhar Rao v. The State Of A.P.,Rep.,Pp

2015-11-07T.Sunil Chowdary2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY CRIMINAL PETITION No.11189 of 2015 ORDER:

This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in Crime No.418 of 2015 of Arundalpet Police Station, Guntur Urban registered for the offences under Sections 420 and 506 I.P.C.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the State.

3. A perusal of the record reveals that the petitioner is the sole accused and the second respondent is the de facto complainant in Crime No.418 of 2015.

4. As per the allegations made in the complaint, the petitioner herein agreed to sell plot No.376 within the limits of Venegandla Village of Peddakakani Mandal, Guntur District on payment of total amount in 34 installments. The second respondent paid almost the entire amount to the petitioner, but he did not execute the sale deed in her favour with an evil motive to cheat her.

5. While exercising the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the Court has to take into consideration the allegations made in the complaint only. The Court is not justified in embarking upon an enquiry as to probability, reliability or genuineness of the allegations made in the complaint at the initial stage of investigation. The material placed before the Court is prima facie sufficient to investigate into the matter in order to ascertain the truthfulness or otherwise of the allegations made in the complaint.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in R.P.Kapoor v.

[1] [2], I am of the State of Punjab and State of Haryana v. Bhajanlal considered view that it is not a fit case to quash the proceedings at the initial stage of the investigation.

7. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the concerned Station House Officer may be directed not to arrest the petitioner till completion of the investigation.

8. In view of the nature of the allegations made in the complaint and also the principle enunciated by the Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar[3], the Station House Officer, Arundalpet Police Station, Guntur Urban is hereby directed to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 41A Cr.P.C in Crime No.418 of 2015 so far as the petitioner/accused is concerned.

9. With the above direction, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

10. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.

________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J Date: 07.11.2015 Ivd [1] AIR 1960 SC 866 [2] AIR 1992 SC 604 [3] 2014 (8) SCALE 250