Manukondu Subba Rao And 3 Others v. The State Of A.P.,Rep.,Pp And Another

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY I.A.Nos.01 and 02 of 2018 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5512 OF 2017 ORDER:

I.A.Nos.01 and 02 of 2018 These miscellaneous petitions are filed under Section 320 (2) and (6) read with Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code (for short "Cr.P.C.") seeking leave to compromise the case and compound the offence punishable under Section 420 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short "I.P.C."), as the matter is settled outside the Court and they entered into compromise and filed joint memo to that effect.

Complainant and the petitioners/accused are present and they are identified by their counsel and Public Prosecutor, produced Photostat copies of aadhar cards in proof of their identity. When the terms and conditions of compromise are explained in vernacular language, they are admitted to be true and correct.

On enquiry, the parties stated that they settled the issue outside the Court due to intervention of elders and well-wishers and they intend to lead peaceful life.

In view of the close relationship between the parties and as the offence committed by the petitioners is not against the society and the compromise is voluntary, I find that it is a fit case to grant permission to compound the offence. Hence, compromise is

MSM,J Crl.P_5512_2017 recorded in terms of the joint memo filed along with the petition. Accordingly, the petitions are ordered.

Crl.P.No.5512 Of 2017 In view of the orders passed in I.A.Nos.01 and 02 of 2018, the present petition is allowed in terms of the joint compromise memo filed by both parties. No costs.

Registry is directed to annex a copy of the joint memo filed by both parties, to this order.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand dismissed.

_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY 25.06.2018 Ksp