A. Nirmala v. The State Of Telangana Rep. By Its Principal Secretary

/ [ 325s ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 4377 OF 2017 Between:

1. A. NIRMALA, D/o. Late A. Kotaiah, Wo. C. Krupananda Reddy, Aged About 41 years, School Assistant (Physical Education), Zilla Parishad High School, Madgul Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

2. A.Srinivasa Reddv , S/o. A. Deva Reddv, Aged about 43 years, working as School Assistant(Phy.Science), UPS, lndanoor, Mandal Kodangal, Mahabubnagar District.

3. N.Sarnatha, , Wo. T. Venkat Rao, Aged about 34 years, Language Pandit Hindi, ZPHS. Kulkulapally (Y), Madgul Mandal, Mahabubnagar Dist. ...PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana rep. by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 22.

2. The Director of School Education, State of Telangana. Saifabad, Hyderabad.

3. The District Educational Officer, Ranga Reddy District.,

4. The District Collector. Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the respondents in not awarding Ten (10) points for effecting transfer on the ground the applicant's spouse is working in other District in the Rules issued in G.O. Ms.No. 12, (School Education (Ser.ll) Department dated 16-6-2015 is illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and unconstitutional and consequently hold that the applicant is entitled for awarding Ten (10) points under Special categories (Spouse category) in the ensuing transfer counseling for the purpose of transfer with all consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S. KRISHNA SHARMA Counset for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER

FIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITIoN(TR) No.4377 OF 2017 ORDER:

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, I I learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has I become infructuous with the efFrux of time and no further orders are required in the Writ petition(TR).

2.

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost.

SD/- N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO //TRUE COPY// ESSISTHIEGISTRAR i l I SECTION OFFICER

1. One CC to SRI S. KRISHNA SHARMA, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION, High Court-for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies BN GJP To, Dstl.

, \ \ \ HIGH COURT DATED:2911112022 STATE q, r I l[N ?sl3 tX :) ao

ORDER

WP(TR).No.4377 of 2017 t\ t1r-. - "

i i.l+, DtsMtsstNc THE WR|T PET|TToN (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS 5a,,U> 97"vr*,1,*\ru,