M/S. Maytas Properties Ltd., Rep. By Its Authorised v. The A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy and The Hon'ble Sri Justice Gudiseva Shyam Prasad Writ Petition No.5681 of 2011 Date: 10.08.2018 Between:

M/s.Maytas Properties Ltd., Rep. by its Authorised Signatory Mr.M.Teja Pratap Raju ..Petitioner and 1.AP State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rep. by its President, Hyderabad and 2 others ..Respondents Counsel for the petitioner:

Mr.Vadeendra Joshi for Mr.S.Niranjan Reddy, Sr.Counsel Counsel for respondent No.1:

AGP for Civil Supplies Counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 3: None appeared The Court made the following:

CVNR,J & GSP,J W.P.No.5681 of 2011 Dt: 10.08.2018 Order: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: "to issue appropriate writ, order, or direction one more in the nature of "Writ of Mandamus" declaring the action of the 1st Respondent Commission in dismissing the petitioner's application in C.C.I.A. No. 2998/2010 in C.C.No. 79/2010 by its order dt. 03-02-2011, filed under Sec.8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to refer the dispute to the Sole Arbitrator by rejecting the complaint in C.C. No. 79/ 2010 on the file of the 1st Respondent Commission."

At the hearing, Mr.Vadeeendra Joshi, learned Counsel representing Mr.S.Niranjan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication as all the claimants have got settled the dispute during the pendency of this Writ Petition. The above submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is placed on record and the Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous.

______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) _______________________ (Gudiseva Shyam Prasad, J) Dt: 10th August, 2018 lur

CVNR,J & GSP,J W.P.No.5681 of 2011 Dt: 10.08.2018