High Court for State of TelanganaWP/13165/2005dismissed

Amaladasu Subba Rao S/O Jaggulu v. The District Collector, (The Agent To Governemtn)

2016-02-29A.Rajasheker Reddy5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND SIXTEEN

Present

Between:

Amaladasu Subba Rao, S/o. Jaggulu, Aged about 52 years, Scheduled Tribe, R/o. Kasinagaram Village, Dummugudem Mandal, Khammam District.

.. Petitioner AND The District Collector, (The Agent to Government), Khammam, Khammam District & 4 others .. Respondents The Court made the following:

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in passing the orders in his proceedings D-Dis.F1-3787/2004, dated 27.05.2005, directing the 4th respondent not to register the petitioner document No.P-26/2003 for transfer of immovable property to an extent of Ac. 1.00 cents in Survey No.31/2 and to an extent of Ac. 6.20 cents in Survey No.73, situated in Kasinagaram Village, Dummugudem Mandal, Khammam District (total extent of Ac. 7.20 cents) as illegal and void and consequently to direct the 1st respondent to issue directions to the 4th respondent to register the petitioner document in question.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned orders are passed by the 1st respondent without giving notice to the petitioner and as such, the same is in violation of principles of natural justice.

3. The W.P.No.21554 of 2003 challenging the eviction orders in L.T.R.Case No.13/DGM/2002/C/937/1997, dated 14.12.2002, passed by the Agency Divisional Officer, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District, dated 14.12.2012, was dismissed holding that the alleged sale made by 4th respondent in favour of petitioner is much later to eviction order, dated 14.12.2002,

and the said sale was not approved by the District Collector, Khammam, Khammam District as per Rule 18 of the LTR Rules framed under the A.P. Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulations, 1959.

4. Since the writ petition is also filed basing on W.P.No.21554 of 2003, for the reasons alike in the order in W.P.No.21554 of 2003, dated 29.02.2016, this Writ Petition is also dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. _________________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J Date: 29th February, 2016 KL

Date: 29th February, 2016 KL