B. Venkateswara Rao, v. B. Vijayalakshmi,

a [ 344s ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD IMONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY IWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA APPEAL SUIT NO: 4527 OF 2004 Appeal Under section '19 of Family Courts Act R/w '104 of CPC, against the Judgment and Decree Dated 19-10-2004 made in OP No.46 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad. Between:

Bodduluri .Venkateswara Rao. S/o B. Rama Rao, Occ: Advocate R/o 314/A, IVILA Colony, Road No 12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad ...AppellanUDefendant AND Bodduluri. Vijayalakshmi. Wo B. Venkateswara Rao, Occ: Housewife R/o 3214, Film Nagar Colony, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. '1.

Bodduluri. Sree, D/o B. Venkateswara Rao, Occ. Student (Rep by his Mother B.Vijayalakshmi) R/o 32lA, Film Nagar Colony, Jubilee Hilts, Hyderabad. Bodduluri. Ram Babu, S/o B. Venkateswara Rao, Occ: Student (Rep by his Mother B.Vrjayalakshmi) Rlo 321A, Film Nagar Colony, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.

... Res po ndents/Pla intiffs Counsel for the Appellant : Sri P lndra Prakash Counsel for the Respondents : Sri D Krishna Murthy The Court delivered the following: Judgment I { '1,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA A.S.No.4527 OF 2OO4 JUDGMENT:

(Per lhe Hon'bte Si Jtlstice Ablinand Kumar Shauili) Learned counsel for the appellant has informed the Court that the Appeal Suit has become infructuous. 2.

In vien of the same, Appeal Suit is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 3.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/. K. SAILESHI DEPU REGISTRAR \ ,TRUE COPY// SE IION OFFICER To, 1 The Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad (with records, if any)

2. One CC to Sri P lndra Prakash, Advocate tOpUCl

3. One CC to Sri D Krishna lVlurthy, Advocate [OpUC]

4. Two CD Copies ADK d a.

6r HIGH COURT DATED:0310212025

JUDGMENT

THE.S t, AS.No.4527 of 2004 o 0 3 ,t:l 26 !

'1 * I DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS b W,l f t.