← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/17552/2019disposed of no costs

M. Sravanthi v. The State Of Telangana

2019-08-22P Naveen Rao4 pages

Date:22.08.2019 Between:

M.Sravanthi W/o late O.Sreedhar Reddy, Aged about 32 years, Occ:Private service, R/o Flat No.146, Venkat Ram Nagar, Suraram Village, Qutbullapur, R.R.District.

... Petitioner And The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary (Revenue) T.S.Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana State and others.

...Respondents

The Court made the following:

ORDER:

The petitioner claims that her husband late O.Sreedhar Reddy is the owner and possessor of agriculture land admeasuring Ac.0.32 guntas situated in Survey No.342/E/A, Kandukuru Village, Vemsur Mandal, Khammam District. She further stated that her husband was also issued pattadar passbooks, title deeds and other relevant documents in respect of the subject property vide Khata No.1395. After death of her husband, she succeeded to the subject property and she made a representation on 20.11.2017, to the 3rd respondent to mutate her name in the revenue records and also to issue pattadar passbooks and title deeds. Apart from the representation, she also submitted application in Form 6(a) through Mee-seva as per the procedure prescribed under the provisions of ROR Act. On 29.04.2019, the Tahsildar made an endorsement that the subject survey number is not reflected in online computer and therefore, such application cannot be accepted. Challenging the same, the present Writ Petition is filed.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 3.

It is not known why the online computer records do not disclose the subject survey number of the petitioner. However, at this stage, no opinion can be expressed on the issue, but, however, granted liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation to the Tahsildar enclosing the copy of Form 6 (a) along with endorsement,

dated 29.04.2019. On filing of such representation, the Tahsildar concerned shall verify the revenue records and also online records and if the revenue records reflect the subject survey number and erroneously the same is not shown in the online records, preliminary steps shall be taken to rectify the same to enable the petitioner to prosecute her application for mutation. If revenue records reflect the status of the land is not of private land and it is some other land, the same may be communicated to the petitioner to workout the remedies as available under law. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of submission of representation including endorsement 29.04.2019 made in Form 6 (a).

4.

With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J AUGUST 22, 2019 YVL

Date:22.08.2019 YVL